runeks

Joined 14 years ago

Karma
6,618
Submissions
2,853
Member since
Mar 5
https://cryptomarketdepth.com/

Twitter: @runeksvendsen

GitHub: https://github.com/runeksvendsen

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 8 days ago
Except that we have a clear definition of what a computer is but not of what constitutes intelligence
Comment · 25 days ago
Go on...
Comment · 1 month ago
Their demo could also change goals, e.g. avoid monsters instead of shooting them, by changing some variable. I'm sure that could also be used to change goals.
Comment · 1 month ago
> economic rent

What's the definition of this term?

Comment · 1 month ago
> The tech group has issued a force majeure notice related to the power supply to the project developer, a unit of Blue Owl Capital, after the site ran into permitting delays after rising local opposition.

Since when can failing to get a permit be considered force majeure?

Doesn't majeure specifically denote something large scale and out of anyone's control, such as a hurricane?

Comment · 1 month ago
Because we import the agricultural products we consume from other countries?
Comment · 1 month ago
> With over 57 million sold worldwide since it went on sale in 1966, the Toyota Corolla is widely considered the best-selling vehicle to date.

Is it or is it not the best-selling vehicle to date? Should be pretty simple to determine.

Comment · 1 month ago
> It regularly seems to come up with terms and descriptions for things in its chain of reasoning and then uses these terms in its output assuming you understand what it's talking about.

GPT does this all the time, too (both Sol and Astra). I constantly have to tell it to not use terms that were not part of the initial prompt.

Comment · 1 month ago
> In the post-AGI economy, humans will eventually stop writing and reading code, but we still need an ambiguity-free way to tell the AIs building the world around us what we want done.

> With laws, our intents can be much more precise than natural language.

Doesn't this just mean that the code is now "laws", ie. the code is now the spec.

Given this, is there any reason think that writing the "laws" for a complex system is any easier than writing the old-fashioned code that implements it?

Comment · 1 month ago
No, it doesn't assume that. It simply assumes that you can verify whether or not the LLM's implementation adheres to the laws you defined up-front — which it does not if it modified the laws.
Comment · 2 months ago
No secret sauce is needed to be valuable
Comment · 2 months ago
Ah, you're right. My mistake.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton