Recent submissions

Comment · 10 months ago
This is why it’s luck.

Putting more out there will increase the probability of a reward, but it doesn’t guarantee it.

Comment · 10 months ago
Comment · 1 year ago
98% = 2 units of UV reaching the skin

99% = 1 unit of UV reaching the skin

Thus 98% filtering lets in 2x as much as 99% filtering

Comment · 1 year ago
Why does psychiatry need to have an ‘equivalent’ of a sprained ankle?

Most people recognise a sprained ankle, at least mild ones, as a self limiting illness. An issue with psychiatric diagnoses is that they are often not taken to be self limiting and often become a large part of a patients self image. While sometimes this can be helpful and help inform treatment it can also be harmful and I have seen this harm first hand in patients I see.

Comment · 1 year ago
Could you recommend any good resources for learning more about microeconomics?
Comment · 1 year ago
Something being ‘instinctually normal’ does not make it inherently the safest option
Comment · 2 years ago
I think another explanation is that the Sahm rule came into an effect last week signalling a possible upcoming US recession.
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
How do you fix a fissure in the anus?

A: Rectal Glyceryl trinitrate

How do you fix GERD?

A: For the majority of people weight loss and dietary changes will do the job

How do you fix Crohns?

A: You don’t ’fix’ Crohn’s per se as there is no cure. But most people with Crohn’s can be have their disease managed well with -mab medications

In all those conditions you named surgical management is very much at the end of the list and for a minority of patients who do not respond to the above. The first line management in all of these conditions very much does look at ‘fixing the problem’ contrary to what your espousing.

Comment · 2 years ago
Both the ‘gold’ answer and the model reference a PA and AP view respectively as well as a lateral chest radiograph. The picture only contains a lateral radiograph though.
Comment · 2 years ago
“- There's a paper from ~6 months ago by some researchers who claimed to get slightly better performance than Whisper vanilla, but their code is not public, and I can't find any blog posts or articles talking about using their work.”

Have you got a link to this paper?

Comment · 2 years ago
https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing

Pricing has been released too.

Per 1 million output tokens:

Mistral-medium $8

Mistral-small $1.94

gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 $2

gpt-4-1106-preview $30

gpt-4 $60

gpt-4-32k $120

This suggests that they’re reasonably confident that the mistral-medium model is substantially better than gpt3-5

Comment · 2 years ago
No I missed it, was looking in the methods section as opposed to the results, thank you!

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton