rootnod3

2 trillion $ companies should have the money to pay for these exploits. If they don’t, go tucking exploit them. If they don’t give a fuck about stealing knowledge from copyrighted material and private git repos, light em up.

Gotta give the AIs some new original material to learn from, eh?

Move to Game of Trees and the integrated gotwebd, move on, have a happy life.

Vote with your wallet. Fuck them.

You shouldn’t have to use LLMs to run your software.

Give it another 6-12 months until the big AI shops shut those capabilities down and running local ones becomes cost prohibitive.

Ah, a vibe code shop?

Maybe it is in the fine-print of the user agreement.

MP support for VMM/VMD is huuuuge.

> Yes, absolutely. But denying their obvious capabilities is not a very effective way to do that.

> I don't see much thought-through analysis from the anti-AI crowd. That seems to have a lot to do with the fact that they're not actually very familiar with the technology, from either a practical or theoretical perspective.

So you imply that anyone anti-AI is not actually familiar with the technology? So only a true Scotsman is able to appreciate the beauty of AI?

> the machines that are smarter than they are

Depends on your definition of smart.

> Also, point of order: "The satire was apparently lost on you" makes no sense, since I wrote the comment and it wasn't intended as satire.

I'll just let that stand for itself and encourage you to read the thread again if it's not beyond your context window.

Yes. The firmware blobs get downloaded at the end of the install via `fw_update`.

Just be sure you understand the code 100% before sending it.

The port itself doesn't mirror the wine code. It is just the recipe on how to build in on OpenBSD + necessary patches.

The satire was apparently lost on you.

And claiming that it is the "most amazing technology humans have ever invented" is telling. Also claiming that a contrarian opinion is immediately rooted in tribal fear and ignorance. Ever bothered to stop and think that there might be good reasons to reject LLMs as a technology the way it is currently being used or is YOUR view of that maybe wilful ignorance and fueled by tribal fear?

But the response you gave was just perfectly playing exactly into the point the parent comment was making.

This reply is so perfect, I would almost think it's satire.

Code by hand? The good old fashioned way? Might be "less efficient", but you will understand what you did and build experience.