> Yes, absolutely. But denying their obvious capabilities is not a very effective way to do that.
> I don't see much thought-through analysis from the anti-AI crowd. That seems to have a lot to do with the fact that they're not actually very familiar with the technology, from either a practical or theoretical perspective.
So you imply that anyone anti-AI is not actually familiar with the technology? So only a true Scotsman is able to appreciate the beauty of AI?
> the machines that are smarter than they are
Depends on your definition of smart.
> Also, point of order: "The satire was apparently lost on you" makes no sense, since I wrote the comment and it wasn't intended as satire.
I'll just let that stand for itself and encourage you to read the thread again if it's not beyond your context window.
> I don't see much thought-through analysis from the anti-AI crowd. That seems to have a lot to do with the fact that they're not actually very familiar with the technology, from either a practical or theoretical perspective.
So you imply that anyone anti-AI is not actually familiar with the technology? So only a true Scotsman is able to appreciate the beauty of AI?
> the machines that are smarter than they are
Depends on your definition of smart.
> Also, point of order: "The satire was apparently lost on you" makes no sense, since I wrote the comment and it wasn't intended as satire.
I'll just let that stand for itself and encourage you to read the thread again if it's not beyond your context window.