robotsliketea
Joined 3 years ago
Karma
284
Submissions
5
Member since
Aug 20
Recent submissions
Comment · 14 days ago
I'd never heard of him and this was very helpful context, thanks!
Comment · 3 months ago
It seems that LLMs often insert new ideas even when asked only to polish writing without changing it: https://bsky.app/profile/tomerullman.bsky.social/post/3mq33c...
I don't think this is surprising. Good technical writing is very precise. If you're starting from non-technical writing, I suspect that in most cases you can't make it "sound scientific" without adding new claims or changing the meaning. (Maybe you are being more careful, but this is something that worries me in general.)
Comment · 2 years ago
Someone has indeed solved this problem before! Your comment reminded me that a project triangulating a cat via BLE was posted to HN a few years ago:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26024049 https://github.com/filipsPL/cat-localizer
Comment · 3 years ago
This is super cool! For California, my understanding (from PG&E materials) was that highest demand and carbon intensity was around 3pm to 9pm. The graph here seems to show that even though demand/supply is smaller at night, we have very little non-solar renewables so that carbon intensity is pretty bad all night as well... If that's true, I'm curious why PG&E makes it sound like electricity use at night is not as bad. Do they anticipate bringing more wind online and are trying to get ahead with the messaging to the public?