robertleoj

Thanks for replying - I really admire your work with mrcal, and have used it for a while in my work. And lensboy is heavily inspired by mrcal.

> Is your splined representation compatible with the mrcal splined stereographic model?

No. It was a conscious design decision to only use pinhole models, at least to begin with. As I understand it, the tradeoff is that the pinhole model does not support ultra-wide lenses like the stereoscopic model does. But I have never used a lens that has a field of view close to the limits of pinhole models, so I just went with pinhole models.

However, if I understood your documentation correctly, the distortion model should be identical, it's just the core model that is different.

> Is your splined lens representation better in some way?

I'm pretty sure it's not - I based it entirely off yours, without trying to improve it. However, I did implement regularization slightly differently.

> I didn't see any documentation about it.

Unfortunately I have not written documentation as impressive as you have in mrcal, though I aim to. I wanted to get the project working as soon as possible to use it at work.

> If you think the mrcal distribution methods could be improved, and are willing to help improve it, I would be very amenable.