Recent submissions

Comment · 15 days ago
If the user has a special remote that, when pressed in a certain way, is capable of triggering a nuclear bomb, and if the user has no idea what clicking the buttons on that remote does (they are, after all, just trying to change channels), you’re telling me that the user is responsible for detonating that bomb, and not the company who build the remote (and did not provide detailed instructions on how that remote works, or configure the remote to Not detonate a bomb)?
Comment · 2 months ago
The worst part is: why are they sending me an SMS when I never agreed to it and didn’t configured that as an MFA option?
Comment · 2 months ago
The worst part is: why are they sending me an SMS when I never configured that as an MFA option?
Comment · 3 months ago
Curious that an hour ago, this was the top post on hackernews, and now it has been relegated to the 3rd page.
Comment · 2 years ago
The irony of this happening on an article talking about bad design...
Comment · 2 years ago
I had no idea about this extension. Now I've tried it, and from a quick test it does seem to indeed work. Thank you for sharing.
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
so, I just tried this, and Gemini answered "I don't have enough information to do this". BUT, then I checked the "drafts", and one of the 3 drafted answers actually contains a short summary of the video. What the hell is happening here?
Comment · 2 years ago
so, I just tried this, and Gemini answered "I don't have enough information to do this". BUT, then I checked the "drafts", and one of the 3 drafted answers actually contains a short summary of the video. What the hell is happening here?

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton