rhim

Same here, just got a notification that one of my watched aur packages got taken over of someone random because it was orphaned.

Kernel level anti cheat is really the maximum effort of locking down a client from doing something suspicious. But today we still see cheaters in those games running these system. Which proofs that a game server just cannot trust a random client out there. I know it's about costs, what to compute on client and what to compute in server side. But as long as a game trusts computation and 'inputs' of clients we will see those cheating issues.

That does not make any sense to me. A human can produce software that is at least as bad. Vice versa, a good developer can also create good software with AI. They should focus on actual quality - the outcome - and evaluate it neutrally rather than making such stupid blanket statements.

It's so crazy and scary that Cloudflare is the single point of failure for the internet.

> You do mentoring because the pay off is a junior that develops into a senior; writes better code more efficiently. But what's the pay off with going through this process with AI?

This point is so underrated, when discussing about replacing junior devs with AI.