rhcom2

I guess this could be speech integral to criminal conduct but seems like a stretch.

> It even went so far as to prohibit websites from offering instructions on how to use a VPN to bypass these checks

How is that not a blatant first amendment violation?

A solution in search of a problem.

I'm not sure that's true. Surely doormen, janitors, and security guards are not "irreplaceable" and can't "halt critical operations beyond their industry".

I don't think I follow why your examples contradict the argument. A draft will always be unpopular.

Republicans in Utah are also trying to remove the power from ballot initiatives because they're upset the Utahans passed an anti-gerrymandering initiative.

He is also Catholic himself.

NHL is similarly frustrating. I pay for ESPN but some games are on TNT, NHL Network, or a broadcast channel. I'm not paying for two different $60 a month services so now they just don't get any of my money.

Of course it isn't the same, but it does show it is just a matter of you not agreeing with the rational

Is jumping on a grenade to save another person suicidal? Or is it just a matter of you not agreeing with the rational?

DNC emails weren't fake either but dumping them all right before the election was certainly intended to be election interference.