redman25

Artificial analysis's "intelligence vs cost per task" chart shows the provider's price. I had deepseek scale the prices against openrouter's prices and re-draw the chart and pareto line.

Some models saw big improvement. Deepseek 4.1 flash in particular joined the pareto when openrouter's real prices were taken into account.

Id love to learn what prompts you’re using to do that. Explanations one at a time. Thats something I’ve thought would be helpful before but didn’t know how to achieve it.

Maybe they’re gunning for speedy non-interactive pricing? Or its a limit of the technology or a business decision?

More like acting without a sense of civic duty is stupid. Or acting without a basis in evidence is stupid.

A large portion of the tests are closed source unfortunately which would make it tough to create a port.

I've been preferring Mimo recently. Same price as deekseek, more reliable tool calling (subjectively), and has some nice qualities in terms of prose, etc.

I've heard others say that Deepseek tends to be smarter on specific problems but that Mimo tends to more well-rounded.

Exactly, intelligence is limited by cost and physical constraints just as much as anything. That's the thing that seems to always be missing from the run-away singularity discussions, it's treated like a perpetual motion machine.

IDK this model release is a bit disappointing considering the community has been chomping at the bit for the 124ba4b model. There was some leaked info about it but people suspect it was not released because it was too close to gemini flash in performance.

I too prefer my misinformation delivered with maximum confidence and no accountability.

What prompt had you given it?

I'm not OP but I work outside and use light mode. Macs are generally fairly bright as long as you aren't in direct sunlight. Solarized light mode for the win though.