rdegges
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
First rule: if you're building the product solo, is it something you're the target user of? I've always felt like the biggest "cheat code" for building successful products is just making them for people like you. I know that goes against a lot of lean startup methodology (talk to users, etc.), but it has always worked in my experience. Use your unique domain knowledge to make something meaningfully better, cheaper, more accessible/simple than the competition.
Second rule: marketing is important. Almost all the things I've built are developer services, so to get user feedback and early traction, I'd submit to go speak at the local meetup groups in my area, talk about the tech stuff I worked on as part of the product, then give people a free shirt if they'd give me some in-person feedback after the event. I made some good friends that way (hello, SoCal Pythonistas!), and also made meaningful product growth. Don't be a shill, just genuinely nerd out about the things you're doing in an authentic way. People like that.
Third rule: write well. Don't use LLMs to spam blog content that's low quality about your product. Write about it yourself. Show examples, highlight features. Don't use marketing words, use simple descriptions.
One question I have on the `tool boundary` methodology -- does this penalize a skill for having any sort of scripts/ embedded? I've found it really helpful to take larger skills, like ones I've built at Snyk which handle data processing, and encode the process in the SKILL.md, but also ship it with python/go code in scripts/ to deterministically handle a lot of data validation/etc. For data analysis skills I feel like it's really hard to just encode teaching logic without costing a fortune in inference.
One small note, I think there may be a small issue in one of the code blocks explaining the client key:
> cache_namespace = tenant_id || client_secret
I believe that should say `tenant_id + client_secret`, ya? To append them together? If you OR them out it'll default to the `tenant_id`, which isn't what you want in this case, I believe.
Anyhow, there are way smarter people than myself who have covered this topic extensively over the years, but I still think that, even in 2026, JWTs are the wrong tools for web auth. They're fine to use for service-to-service stuff, but if you have the option, just use PASETO -- it solves a lot of the issues!
This is not at all true. Plus, it's inconsequential -- ICE agents have no authority over US citizens except in extremely limited circumstances (https://www.perplexity.ai/search/9f4518c4-8a32-474a-bd92-3f1...), and even if they did, being able to arrest someone, file charges, and work their way through the justice system is the answer... Not killing people on the streets.
It’s silly to dismiss rational, logic-based worry as “propaganda”.
This will 100% make me reconsider travel and avoid airports with ICE agents. I think the writing on the wall is clear, nobody is safe.
I end up getting way better quality.
The same is true for existing projects, but it always takes a whole lot longer as I'm typically chatting with my AI assistant to figure out what conventions are there that I forgot, etc., before building an AGENTS.md to make future changes simpler.
Love how this takes care of that.
I was so floored to meet him in person, and as you'd probably imagine, he's super kind and relaxed =D
A++ human being who's contributed so much to our field.
Our research lab discovered this novel threat back in July: https://invariantlabs.ai/blog/toxic-flow-analysis and built the tooling around it. This is an extremely common type of issue that many people don't realize (basically, when you are using multiple MCP servers that individually are safe, but together can cause issues).
Socials: - github.com/rdegges - linkedin.com/in/rdegges - reddit.com/user/rdegges - instagram.com/randalldegges - https://bsky.app/profile/rdegges.com
---
I'm just a happy programmer that likes to hack stuff.
You can contact me via my site: https://www.rdegges.com/ or via email [email protected]