rayrag

> It's a UI builder, not a set of components.

I think it's UI builder that has predefined set of components that user can customise - globally (by customising 'theme' - font family, primary colors etc) or per component (padding, margins, overwriting theme settings). From these components user creates pages/templates. User can create there own components if they want so that's good.

Bu OP doesn't show those predefined components even as images, ever more there's no information how many components there are. And predefined components are important feature of most web builders as they can save a lot of time. Also well designed components (good color scheme, typography, spacing) helps develovers without design skills.

> It’s worse than that. I liked this article, but it was anonymous and undated. I looked around the site to find out who this was. Despite the author seemingly wanting you to know about him, what other people think about his skills, etc., he seems not to want you to know what his name is. I find this kind of thing bizarre. Does he want you to guess it from the URL? I finally saw his name in his page about “books I wrote”.

I'm guessing that his website is work in progress or/and he's learning cms he's using.

>I think his design ideas are sound. But visual design without any notion of information design is like having a beautiful car with no wheels. Or something.

Sure, but you should learn from multiple sources as not everyone should teach about everything. It's up to you to connect that knowledge.

For me pure black text on pure white background looks good, but pure white text on pure black background it doesn't look good, my eyes are getting tired faster but that also depends on what font family/weight/size is used. For thin font weights (100-300) maximum contrast increases readablity, for regular/bold weights it's not neccessary to be pure white on pure black.