r9295

In my experience, the issue has been likelihood of exploitation or issue severity. Claude gets it wrong almost all the time.

A threat model matters and some risks are accepted. Good luck convincing an LLM of that fact

This has been the case since I moved to Germany, 6 years ago. National humiliation is apparently an insufficient detterent.

It really depends on the implementation? From my understanding, WebRTC uses it to broker the connection and nothing more. Then it's p2p

136 males? Fooled by randomness

Unsure what either of those have to do with this law

WASM runs in the browser which is why it receives so much consideration (rightfully so).

Personally, I think that's a good idea. Design patterns naturally make sense (Visitor, Builder for e.g) once you encounter such a situation in your codebase. It almost makes complete sense then. Otherwise IMHO, it's just premature abstraction

Honest question: what's the fun in travel if you remove all uncertainty?

How is one supposed to context switch between reading a book and rigorously understanding and verifying potentially hundreds of lines of code generated by an AI?

Glad to hear this! Please create an issue if you run into any issues during the integration.