quantum2022

100% spot on.

Who owns AI-generated code? I would think the 'inventor' of the product the code is producing, since AI's can't invent products.

I built this using Claude. I am not a programmer. I also learned how to use GitHub from Claude so if I messed that up sorry :) This is a calendar to help out my cousin who's a single mother raising two little girls alone. She has trouble balancing all their doctors appointments, dentist appointments, soccer practices, baseball practices, school events, etc. It's supposed to be a calendar that's greyed out to anyone viewing except the owner. Anyone with the web address can update the calendar with whatever event it is. Only the owner (Kimble or if anyone else ever uses it them) would be able to see what the events were and the descriptions. Basically, I was wondering if anyone could review this and see if it's really doing what it should be doing. Also, any ideas on how other people if they wanted to use it could get a free calendar website (or just have them use github for that?) would be appreciated.

Thanks for your time!

I personally hope AI doesn't quite deliver on its valuations, so we don't lose tons of jobs, but instead of a market crash, the money will rotate into quantum and crispr technologies (both soon to be trillion dollar+ industries). People who bet big on AI might lose out some but not be wiped out. That's best casing it though.

Want a product idea? You know the paper bags that you get at the grocery store? Why don't they have coupons/advertising printed on them? Take your groceries home and then cut up the bag for coupons for the next time you shop. I don't think I've ever seen this, and I can't find anything similar in a quick google search. Maybe you could create a business out of that?

I don't think so. I'm pretty sure it was considered an 'act of G-d', not an act of China :)

I think you could also have specific pandemic insurance, and that paid out, but those were rare before Covid.

Yes, maybe what people create with it will be more basic. But is 'good enough' good enough? Will people pay for apps they can create on their own time for free using AI? There will be a huge disruption to the app marketplace unless apps are so much better than an AI could create it's worth the money. So short Apple? :) On the other hand, many, many more people will be creating apps and charging very little for them (because if it's not free or less than the value of my time, I'm building it on my own). This makes things better for everyone, and there'll still be a market for apps. So buy Apple? :)

You're missing the forest for the trees. It speeds up people who don't know how to program 100%. We could see a flourishing of ideas and programs coming out of 'regular' people. The kind of people that approach programmers with the 'I have an idea' and get ignored. Maybe the programs will be basic, but they'll be a template for something better, which then a programmer might say 'I see the value in that idea' and help develop it.

It'll increase incremental developments manyfold. A non-programmer spending a few hours on AI to make their workflow better and easier and faster. This is what everyone here keeps missing. It's not the programmers that should be using AI; it's 'regular' people.

There goes the dream of ai allowing normal people to develop cool stuff. Talk about 'big company' stifles the little man.

Has anyone bothered to read section 2? It explicitly states that anyone the government deems a threat to themselves or others can be put away.

This is neat! I always wondered if there would be a way to 'containerize' tables like this. IE a regular table is like a bulk carrier ship, with everything stuffed into it. If you could better organize it like a container ship, you could carry much more stuff more efficiently (and offload it faster too!)