px

Of course they are biased. That is his point. But our own blind spots can be revealed by studying those different perspectives.

I don't know. This seems to be the thrust of his arguments:

"By delegating information curation to multiple independent parties with demonstrated domain knowledge and critical ability, I ensure that what I read is not a mere reflection of what I believe."

Seems pretty reasonable to me.

Do you have any specific critique of "Abnormal Returns" and "The Big Picture," the curators he cites?

Codecademy.com has effective lessons on CSS. You may find it very useful.