proprietario
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
So why should it be morally ok to show support/better the public image/engage with a party that is supporting/purporting some huge morally bad things?
My reasoning is as follows, I wonder where you wouldn't agree:
A: You shouldn't support people doing morally bad stuff
B: Someone supporting morally bad things is morally bad
B.2: Sharing/Engaging with them shows support and betters their public image
C: Kaspersky is an oligarch supporting stuff that is morally wrong
D: So you shouldn't support him by driving engagement to his site
I'd be very grateful if they started labelling it accordingly as they do it with other synthetic flavours (eg strawberry, GER)
I read it as this: In effect, if you make money of the software you destribute you are responsible to address security issues
I hope that this is a change for the better. Now everyone who piggy-backed on some OSS project so far has to either maintain a fork (-> more contributions) or provide incentive for the dev to fix it (money?)
otherwise are there some docs/papers on how this has to be implemented so I can start my own?
Can you share more of your story and maybe give me some advice, I really don't want to end up burnt out