prickledpear
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
My hope is that MRR is sufficient, but not necessary for acceptance!
The answer to the first is a certain yes. There are laws against businesses forming monopolies in the United States. You can read up on the Sherman and Clayton antitrust acts from the 1890s and 1910s to start with. There is also considerable case law stemming from this legislation.
The answer to "should there be laws against monopolies" is a little more open. One theoretical justification for breaking up monopolies, is that in some cases monopolies cause economic inefficiencies. Look up "deadweight loss from monopoly pricing".
It's very complicated to measure any efficiencies or inefficiencies from tech monopolies, so I don't think there's a clear answer.
It's also not generally agreed upon that economic efficiency should be the goal of government, so there is a lot of room for debate on that question.
One specific question I have is: do his individual works stand alone or do you have to understand his life and/or complete body of work and the context in which it was created to appreciate it?
If you saw one or two of his paintings without ever having heard of Jasper Johns would you recognize them as masterpieces?
If other accelerators compete with YC, entrepreneurs may choose to do business with an accelerator that selects smaller classes.
Economists have found evidence that as ownership concentration increases, firms act more like a monopoly.
See this paper for one example in the airline industry: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jofi.12698
If someone is squatting on a high-value domain, they will have to pay high fees or sell the domain to someone who can make better use of it.
This prevents someone else from squatting on google-search.com and allows it to go to the highest value use -- protecting Google's brand.