prathje

My entire life, I have found meaning in solving problems with code. With AI, this is no longer competitive. Now I develop more than ever and am more productive than ever, but it still doesn't feel as rewarding. I would like to go back.

Three.js renders them onto canvas elements, actually, so perhaps there is an easy way to render them onto individual canvases and overlay them? It would be interesting to see how close one could get with 2D layers to the feel of the 3D version. I guess when they are that small, it would be very hard to notice, right?

Yeah, this seems to happen when the fur matches the pixels... Do you have a good idea for how to approach this?

That is a great idea! I initially built them for another project where CSS was not available but it could really push the performance. Right now, their image is cached already when they are not moving but with CSS maybe one could render initial components with threejs and then animate them further with CSS, right? Or would you build them with CSS from the very beginning?

Yeah, the resolution might reduce the plush effect. Maybe try increasing the strand size or the fur length? Does that look better?

I would use it to render HTML elements such as inputs or a website in videos. Even though HTML is powerful the control over every pixel is important for high quality videos.

Hi guys, I wanted to share one of my friend's videos here to see if you would be interested in something slow and grounded. In my opinion, this is much needed in today's fast world...

Of course, if the data/knowledge is open and accessible, why not?

Well, of course learning isn't the problem and shouldn't be. But what about reselling/commercialising that knowledge? That is the big (commercial) opportunity. But if AI models learn by fitting their parameters to the given data, then overfitting on said data could result in the IP or copyrighted being "slopped" out verbatim?

What about IP and copyright?

We got asked this question two weeks ago when we conducted a workshop on effective and responsible use of AI tools at a local conference. But how can you argue about about IP and copyright if the breakthrough of LLMs is potentially based on circumventing or breaking IP and copyright in the first place?

How do you feel about all of this?