plurch
Joined 10 years ago
Karma
7
Submissions
12
Member since
Mar 18
Recent submissions
Comment · 1 year ago
Thanks! Yes, evaluations and benchmarks are fundamentally important. It's the only way to know if you are actually making improvements.
Comment · 2 years ago
Hello HN! Builder here. Let me know if you have any feedback or questions about how this works :)
Comment · 10 years ago
Thanks for the feedback. I will add a “latest reviews” list to the homepage ASAP - some others have suggested this also.
Correct, we are not aiming for code reviews but for package quality/reputation. Hopefully the descriptions on the homepage are clear and this does not confuse too many people.
Regarding the problem of outdated reviews - I have a specific field where the reviewer can put the current version that they are reviewing (example: https://goo.gl/rWMHgB shows version 4.8.2). Reviewers can also easily update their existing reviews and bump this version as necessary. We also show the date that the review was last updated.
Comment · 10 years ago
I see your point. A list that shows recent reviews on the homepage would be helpful.
Comment · 10 years ago
Which aspects of the design do you think need improvement?
I agree that there are not many reviews since I have just launched, but I need people to be aware of the site’s existence so that they can contribute.
Currently there isn’t any notification system in place for package maintainers, but that would be a nice feature to add.
Comment · 10 years ago
Hello Hacker News, I am Patrick, creator of GitHub Reviews. Thanks for stopping by!
I built this web application that lets people review popular GitHub repositories. The site allows users to:
* Determine quality by reading reviews and viewing aggregate ratings
* Discover related projects that are linked to each review
* Share their thoughts about a package with the rest of the community
* Improve repositories that they own by listening to their users
Currently on stackoverflow, questions in this vein are closed because answers would be too subjective. This usually happens despite strong interest from users.
Here are some reviews that I wrote: https://githubreviews.com/plurch
Any feedback or suggestions are welcome!
https://relatedrepos.com/
github.com/plurch
x.com/plurch