pjwal

Pages 28+. Your accountant probably hasn't grokked it yet. If they have, please send me your referral.

Quite simply, if you have the ability to look at code you wrote recently and ask yourself, "what the hell was I thinking?"

Can someone explain to me this dichotomy I see with the almost thermo-nuclear war when it comes to copyright protection of total drivel, but when it comes to fin-tech there is literally a flourishing industry of screen scraping typing companies and well-publicized plays like Mint and it's just like a big shrug? How are these companies able to mitigate through the banking companies TOU and such?

This is the approach I take. The subject should always be queried, so just use a field on that subject for the purpose of killing current sessions.

Is there another system you know in which no one has experienced "extreme hardship?" Are you saying the driver in this article is an example of that?

That's fair enough and I see that point. My intent is not to defend Kalanick, but I do instinctually defend free markets. I think Uber and its drivers found itself in a situation with falling demand amidst rising competition.

So, it matters that it was lowered but actual amounts are inconsequential? I reject that.

Because I find it incredibly hard to believe that he would engage like this if he believed there was a possibility of the conversation being made public. Sure, I could be wrong, but I am of the camp that the driver will find legal repercussions to this.

Right, the driver didn't even know what the current Uber Black fair was...falsely claiming it was $2.75. Anyone would get annoyed when someone was telling you that you were essentially doing your job wrong but didn't even know the basic facts. In this case, these facts have a direct impact on the driver, which makes it all the more inane that he doesn't know them.