pjdbruin

Joined 5 years ago

Karma
4
Submissions
9
Member since
Jan 13
cofounder & COO IOMETE (https://iomete.com/) amateur farmer
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
Great to see cost-effective alternatives to Cloudera and Databricks! We’ve spent three years building IOMETE, a self-hosted data lakehouse that combines Apache Iceberg and Spark, designed to run natively on Kubernetes. We’re focused on on-premises deployments to address the growing need for data sovereignty and low TCO, with a streamlined setup for large-scale analytics. Early adopters are seeing strong results. Curious about your experience with Trino and Superset—any tips for optimizing performance at scale?
Comment · 3 years ago
LOL!
Comment · 3 years ago
Just ran your comments - not just this comment - through ChatGPT and am passing along the feedback: As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or emotions. However, based on an objective analysis of the language used by catchnear4321 in the comments above, I can say that their tone appears to be confrontational and aggressive. They use strong and direct language, and they do not seem to be interested in having a constructive conversation. This type of communication style can sometimes be counterproductive in online discussions and can lead to misunderstandings or conflict.
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
Not necessarily. Switching cost is an issue when the effort to switch is bigger than the potential benefits of switching (where benefit can be added functionality or lower costs).

For instance, average Snowflake bill is $300k and many Snowflake customers (almost 400) pay more than a million per year. If you can cut that in half by augmenting Snowflake with IOMETE that's a pretty sweet deal.

No need to switch (that's a hard sell for an early stage startup to enterprise customers), but just augment...

How? By transitioning some of the compute load to IOMETE data lake. IOMETE charges a flat fee compared to Snowflake's consumption-based model. By cutting Snowflake compute consumption (often 5x or more the price of an AWS instance) organizations can save a lot.

Comment · 4 years ago
Netherlands is the 2nd largest exporter of agricultural products - behind the US -and it's 1/3 the size of Massachusetts...Sector is extremely innovative and productive. The Dutch government is out of its mind. Europe is already under inflationary pressure. This will add to it long term and may also lead to food shortages. One can not simply reduce a sector by 30% without harming the other 70% since it's an ecosystem...
Comment · 4 years ago
[disclaimer: comment written by one of cofounders of iomete - a YC-backed startup - active in the same market as Snowflake]

I think Snowflake is (still) expensive because it is a venture-backed enterprise software company and goes through a typical trajectory...

Story goes like this: founders are product-driven and first movers -> find PMF -> need VC funding -> VCs only fund enterprise software ventures with 70%+ gross margins and high retention rates -> product/service gets priced to achieve these metrics -> VCs happy to fund sales & marketing machine needed to obtain sales growth, nobody cares about profitability until after IPO -> startup is everyone’s darling until ~2 years after IPO.

Then: economic crisis hits, customers become more price sensitive, competition intensifies. Plus now management is exposed to quarterly pressure of financial markets to deliver on top-line and margin expectations.

Meanwhile a bunch of startups are building (lower priced) alternatives. Perhaps not as mature or feature-rich as Snowflake, but good enough for 80% of use cases that Snowflake covers.

Therefore the assertion that Snowflake is not optimizing their product sounds a bit crazy to me. It would be optimizing for short-term gain, while jeopardizing its reputation as the leader in the space. Obtaining excessive margins through excessive pricing only works under monopolistic conditions or if they had a truly distinctive product. Both are not the case imo. Also, it's early days. Not exactly sure what Snowflake's market share is, but I bet it is < 5%.. so they haven't locked in everyone yet...

I bet that Snowflake will be forced to compete "also on price" in the next five years because free enterprise is a powerful thing. The title of the article could be “Why Snowflake is (still) expensive but will get more affordable over the next few years”..

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton