pinars
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
The Oracle on SPARC cluster (at the top, 2010) performs 30.2M qualified tx/min vs the 16K tx/min in this blog post. The Oracle cluster also costs $30M, which is clearly higher than the Cockroach cluster's cost.
That said, the TPC-C benchmark is new to me. Happy to update this comment if I'm misreading the numbers.
(Edited to incorporate the reply below.)
On the Data Migration Tool (DMS), I really wish they would fix important issues related to Postgres. Right now, if you have a JSONB column in your database, DMS truncates the data.
This makes it impractical to use DMS for most Postgres deployments: https://forums.aws.amazon.com/message.jspa?messageID=735961
You call them, ask them, plead with them. Nothing. "Your application is in the system and is getting processed."
Nine months into it, it turned out that they lost my digital picture taken at a USCIS facility. How in this day and age one loses digital pictures is beyond me.
Nothing as dramatic as a 7-0 margin as suggested by the article's data though.
Edit: Also sadly, Turkey didn't make it to the World Cup in '98.
Does anyone know changes to average weight/height for the population in the US?
For people who need SQL and HyperLogLog, we found this extension to work pretty well.
I think what's interesting with TPC-C is that you can sort the results based on performance or price/performance. On the price/performance metric, SPARC looks expensive. Dell has a $20K SQL Anywhere cluster that can do 113K tx/min.
I wonder if anyone tried to run these benchmarks on the cloud and how one would calculate total cost of ownership there now.