photon137
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
And, as another commenter mentioned, getting a sweet arbitrage on the low borrowing rate and earning a nice dividend yield doesn't hurt.
His statement (after adding the constant trend) is misleading:
"Now let’s repeat the same tests on these new series. We get surprising results: the correlation coefficient is 0.96 — a very strong unmistakable correlation"
What he's calculated is the correlation between a set of points from y_1 and y_2 - and that will be large, of course - their (deterministically increasing) means have correlation 1.
The quantity that qualifies as correlation for predictability purposes is actually the correlation between the deviations from mean.
This is all fairly clear if you use the actual formula (Pearson correlation):
E[(y_1 - mu * t)(y_2 - mu * t)] / (sigma_y1 * sigma_y2)
Only downside is that for something like a customer-facing portal, the identity-management is tied to Windows-specific features, for now - so have had to build a custom solution for this that runs on Linux. Waiting for ASP .NET vNext and its Identity solution when it becomes slightly more mature.
EDIT: Also evaluating a move to Azure. Primary driver (for choosing the .net stack) has been prior experience with C#, .NET and Visual Studio
English as the primary language (great learning resources available for it all across the globe).
Real economic mobility - you can really make it big if you're smart, persevering and slightly lucky. Who you know matters to a certain extent in all countries, but the significance of that factor is less in the US as compared to the other countries, in my opinion (others may disagree, of course).
EDIT: My point is - mathematics is axiomatic in its very basis - the axioms have to be agreed upon by people who agree upon a conclusion derived from those axioms.
It's simply a problem of what gets mapped to what in the absence of mapping channels we take for granted.
Education is probably not a significant variable here.