perdamgaard

The best part is his German accent.

Great concept. I have just tweeted a link to your site.

Thanks. It lools interesting.

Basically, it all points back to your concept. Have you identified your bridgehead target group? The target group that is willing to pay ten times as much for your service as their current best alternative? If you cannot describe them, then there is a real risk that you are not on the right track. You then have to ask yourself: Why can I not do so? Is it because they do not exist, or is it because we have the wrong approach with your current concept.

I have written a book on the future business implication of AI. It is called "Employeeless?" You might want to check it out,

Has anyone seen some pictures of the concept car?

Thanks, that is good to know. We are finishing the development of a feature where you can paste Excel or CSV files directly into (any) online system. So if you have data in Excel that need to be imported or processes in a business system, you can automate such tasks. Would that be of interest to you?

Per Damgaard Husted her with a clarification to this remark. First of all, I would like to thank you all for the valuable feedback that we have got from you for the last 24 hours. It means everything to us. This being said, I feel like this Patent comment is making us look dishonest. So here is the deal. I hold an AI patient that we are currently not using in the product as it is now because it is not AI-based. We mention that we hold an AI patient on the last part of the About us page, in a part where we outline general information on the founders' backgrounds. That's it; it is not a dominant part of our marketing material. Our plan is still to include AI in the application when it makes sense to do so.

I like discussions and critique, and almost all of what you have said in this forum is true, and your reflections are valuable learnings for us. Please don't take this remark as a signal that I am not open to feedback because that is what we are seeking, and I prefer the negative because that is where you learn the most.

Hi This is Per, then founder of Cognifirm. Thanks for your reflections; they are extremely valuable to me (us), and I can now tell you that the pricing will be changed because of your input. Our pricing problem is this: We are moving from direct sales to online sales, so our model has to cater to both target groups. Direct obvious is the more expensive version. But it is clear to me that: The model has to be more simple The entry price will have to be much lower

This will be implemented shortly when we have had more time to finetune the model and its business consequences. Cheers, Per

Hi My name is Per, and I am the creator of Cognifirm. First of all, you should know that I appreciate your reflections and on our product. Also, some of you were expecting a PHP error on our website. We have switched to a different version without the video link that created that error. I am sorry that you have to experience this.

Anyway, feel free to ask me any questions you might have.

I will also get back to you in the threads where it makes sense to do so. Cheers. Per