pentab

Thanks for your recommendation and sorry for not fully understanding the rules. I tried to fix this but did not see how to edit my submission.

Hi Pavel. Thanks for your comment and for sharing your perspective! We indeed believe both IP Fabric and ForwardNetworks follow promising approaches. A key difference is that we are focusing on a broader range of data sources (including NetFlow, SNMP, BGP, etc) and therefore can also support a live view of a given network.

Regarding the variety, we agree that network data sources suffer from a lot of subtle variety, which can be really frustrating especially because this variety makes it hard to access very valuable information. This is our main motivation to integrate LLMs, as a powerful tool that can naturally handle subtle variety.

Regarding the name, it was not our intention to copy or imitate. We chose "NetFabric" because we felt it accurately represented our vision of creating a seamless, integrated network monitoring solution that weaves together diverse network data sources.

Are you not worried about compromising all your passwords when one of them is compromised? I assume attackers know they can replace the service name in a leaked password?

How do you avoid merge conflicts? Do you only ever edit your KeePassXC files on one machine?

Yes, it is sad that setting up debugging is so tedious.

Could you give some examples or languages/environments with "bad" debuggers?

What kind of information would help you to debug? And what kind of information is "too much"?

Personally, I think "too much" is when you get a large table of all variables and their values; it is quite hard to locate the one you care about...

I don't think I understand. Are you saying that debuggers have no use on your own code, and people avoid looking at other people's code? Also, are you saying that there exists no debugger for <insert language here>?