pantalaimon

Yea and let's just compare Starship and SLS to see how well the works

It's basically the Amish of IT.

The shift is like that from horse drawn carriage to motor vehicle.

But AI is much better at finding bugs during code review than humans, we've seen that demonstrated very publicly.

The dialect usually isn't too strong, it's doable if you know German.

Arrg but the period table already has a natural order, sorting elements alphabetical isn't exactly intuitive - although fitting given the parent company.

So why not call it Argon 4.1?

If I ask Claude to 'Review this PR' it will usually generate a very useful output and find bugs I wouldn't have spotted.

It does not have to be a wall of slop, maybe you only used LLMs 2 years ago where this would have been all you'd get.

When was the last time you used a LLM? This is not an issue with current models.

> a human actually understands what he's doing. He isn't just generating something plausible based on statistics.

What makes you so sure that this is not the same thing?

I wouldn't bet on local compute. Even if it may end up cheaper in the long run, the convenience of just another SaaS subscription sure beats the high upfront const and continuous maintenance required with local deployments.

We've seen businesses moving everything to the cloud before AI, we'll see more of that as regulatory requirements are increasing.

There are also several events around it that make it nice, like meeting random other FOSDEM attendees over a beer or dancing at ByteNight

Mass starvation was more of a communism thing, not accounting for wars.