pajuhaan
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
I am posting this from Iran.
Because of the unstable and dangerous situation around Iran, and because there is a real sense of uncertainty about what may happen next, I decided to publish this work now even though it was still in its final stage of polishing.
The paper is about an emergent fundamental constant, specifically the fine-structure constant alpha. I know this is a big claim, and I am not asking anyone to accept it casually. i'm simply asking physicists, mathematically minded readers, and anyone seriously interested in foundations to take a look and tell me where it stands.
I do not know what will happen in the coming days or weeks. that is exactly why i did not want to keep waiting for a perfect moment. I wanted the work to be visible now.
manuscript: Alpha — Emergent The Fine-Structure Constant https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396352740_Alpha_-_E...
If this direction seems interesting, this is not the only result in the framework; the same line of thought also leads to consequences for the one-loop electron, a three-loop proton structure, and a four-loop bosonic sector, with possible predictions beyond the known particle list.
Emergent Electron Mass from Two-Space Boundary https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396387730_Emergent_...
Three-Loop Junction Stability and the Proton-Electron Mass Ratio in the Relator Framework https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399232799_Three-Loo...
Relator Z4-locked emergence of the massive bosons (W, Z, H) and a Z5 multi-TeV charged quartet https://www.researchgate.net/publication/401193346_Relator_Z...
If you are a physicist, i would genuinely appreciate a careful read, a criticism, or a short reaction or even show to whoever it would be intresting for. even a clear explanation of why you think it fails would be valuable to me.
My view is becoming increasingly simple: the missing key behind quantum gravity may not be a more complicated structure, it's a simpler one, the idea that wave-function evolution is locked to the speed of light through. simple, but powerful!!
At this point, i think the theory deserves serious reading from physicists willing to examine it carefully and, if it holds up, advocate for it. I've been developing it largely independently, and i hope to eventually present it in seminars as well. If the situation in Iran changes, i believe that moment may finally be possible.
If you read it, I’d especially value criticism on the mathematical structure, physical interpretation, and whether the emergence claims are genuinely nontrivial.
I can pretty much tell that it's very unlikely to find a Lagrangian that leads to a closed-form formula for the electron mass (on loop in C-space model), then give proton mass in (N=3) and electroweak scale in N=4:
Electron: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17219278
We can accept 10^500 possible predictions by string theory, or just not. Here, this paper shows one inch formula that predicts and shows masses of particles as a balance between boundry of two spaces. one space is 1D complex space, and another is our normal 3D space.
When I got the mass of the electron, I wasn't too sure, but when we get to new values for the particle by increasing just the N=1,2,3.4,... parameters, i'm almost certain that something important has been discovered.
For example, I asked about the origin of electron mass and charge: https://chatgpt.com/share/699188c1-9838-800f-bdd3-2aea55dcf5...
In Relator theory, time dilation is intrinsic (not observer-issued) and Rω=c reframes why the usual paradoxes show up. curious what HN thinks; happy to be challenged.
It lands at 877.83 s, close to the best bottle results, and i also discuss why beam/proton-counting can end up higher.
I’m not claiming this replaces the Standard Model — more like a checkable hypothesis about where these timescales might emerge from.
preprint: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400280164_A_Two-Bod...