pacifika

Guilty until proven otherwise?

LLM harnesses haven’t retired the feature

You’re missing out on people getting better at working with ai to improve better long term goals, like testing suites and guardrails, velocity is inconsistent in my experience.

And vibe coding apps in the gym, is like playing a game by typing a cheat code, honestly it’s not satisfying

Try and export a few thousand Notes entries with images.

Change how you like your day to day workflows in terms of window management

Share a home made app with some friends without helping them install it

Fix a bug in the vendors software by writing a patch

Lock-in: ownership over user choice and data

I thought our climate survival would have been that.

If you don’t understand how the sausage was made you have made legacy sausage.

You wouldn’t want to run it without instruments and effects I’d imagine.

I've been building diagnostic tools for identifying and correcting errors with the syncing and backup process of the JottaCloud backup solution. This is its operational lore described as it might be told by firelight three hundred years on, when nobody remembers what a daemon was.

Key points only.

Anything written for humans should be written by humans.

Mainly I’m concerned about shortcut conflicts such as command q

You rather open the server up to security issues than have software where the developer has been assisted by ai which you feel decreases the quality of the code or is it for moral reasons?

Rsync is not being vibe coded, and it’s not become slop so would love to understand the position.

That’s not how LLMs are used by experienced engineers.

Reminds of the days when windows and macs folks were debating each other, made it impossible to announce Mac software on a software forum with windows users.

The significant thing that will result from this is private issue lists and disabling open PRs. and then you’re worse off as an ai sceptic.