othello

Joined 16 years ago

Karma

948

Submissions

139

Member since

Feb 18

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 2 months ago

This is completely incorrect. Aviation contributes 2.5% of global emissions (but is terrible on a per capita basis, as only around 10% of the world's population travels on any given year). Global shipping accounts for 2.3% of global human-made emissions [1].

In transport emissions, passenger vehicles dominate by far (with around 12% of global GHG emissions), even more so in developed countries. Then freight by road with 7.5% of total emissions.

Maritime shipping is actually the least carbon intensive way to transport goods over long distances by at least two orders of magnitude [2].

[1] https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport

[2] https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/transport/06_figure_8-6/

Comment · 3 months ago

To be fair, that's more the Third Republic's verdict than what recent historians have concluded. For sure, Sedan was a catastrophe and the Mexican adventure was worse, but the two decades in between gave France the railway build-out, Haussmann's Paris, the creation of modern investment banks, and even universal male suffrage, which the Republic then kept ([1], [2] & [3]).

In this particular instance, everybody in this thread seems to be forgetting the region where the fires are currently raging used to be very unsanitary swamps before the pine forests were planted. These older wetlands were a major source of disease and misery for the local population. The reason why they only planted pines were because the soil there is poor & acidic. Nothing else grows really. Now of course, this needs to be rethought in the light of climate change, but it wasn't a stupid idea at the time.