Recent submissions

Comment · 6 years ago
genuine question (asking because i have a biased perspective): why dont you consider advances in ai to be a major shift? in the past decade, there has been a rapid increase in capabilities in computer vision, language understanding, robotics, etc.
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
"easy to copy" isn't really a factor here tbh, seeing how tiktok (along with vine, snap, facebook, etc) is a classic example of network effects.
Comment · 6 years ago
another one!

berkeley rise lab is such a powerhouse - spark, mesos, etc. just in the past few years. it really puts some of these big tech companies to shame.

Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
in my experience, most people dismiss cyc as a failed science experiment. this shouldnt be! after all, many important deep learning concepts have their roots in the 80s, and it is possible that cyc could be revived too.
Comment · 6 years ago
same here, although i know unity has been staffing up their ml team eg arthur juliani doing good work at unity. more generally speaking, i think there is a clear need for reliable, robust simulators in ml. (openai released a few interesting environments a few years back but adoption seems to have plateaued, from my perspective.)

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton