nsdarren
Joined 8 years ago
Joined 8 years ago
There are a couple of UX sharp edges to clear up for sure - a bit more validation, confirmations, etc to be added.
Hiding how to quit the app was just another attempt to win over the Vim crowd!
(Yes ctrl+c is the intended way, it’s in the docs now and I’ll add it to the app footer)
There's no fallback to the ANSI theme of the terminal as it breaks a lot of Textual's features.
There is a PR open at the moment relating to detecting the terminal background colour I believe, so in the future we could probably use that to choose a reasonable fallback.
I had a look at the Bruno website for the first time a few weeks ago, although I haven't tried it for myself yet. I'm definitely inspired by and agree with a lot of the principles behind Bruno: local first, developer friendly, readable/Git-friendly collections and so on.
I think I share a lot of the same motivations as Bruno's creator - I feel the landscape of HTTP API testing clients may actually have regressed in recent years from a developer's perspective, as the companies behind Postman/Insomnia etc. figure out how to monetise them.
Maybe you don't find it valuable because your setup and mad vi skills offer you an alternative (which I'm very sure is just as feature-rich as what is described in the post, which you didn't read). Isn't it obvious how a more accessible solution might be useful to some people?
I for one welcome the efforts of the Warp team to improve terminal UX.