nhanb

>And for the UI I just pipe everything to the system's "less" command.

I never thought of that as an option. Thanks for the tip haha.

By "it" do you mean landlock or fil-c? Also elaboration would be nice.

I read somewhere that Hacker News should have been named Startup News, and sometimes interactions like the one upthread reminds me of that. I'm not saying it's wrong - if you're good at something don't do it for free and all that - but it's kinda sad that in-depth discussions on public forums are getting harder and harder to find these days.

That's gross misrepresentation. He wrote _lots_ of helpful educational articles on zig that painted it in a good light. I would know because I learned a great deal from his posts when I started with zig. Recently he posted a grand total of 2 articles expressing his confusion/skepticism of new zig features, that's it.

Idk, Andrew's comment seems fair enough to me.

Husky (android app) does support multi-account. I'm using it right now. I imagine there should be something equivalent for ios. It's not rocket science.

> I didn't get a larger monitor just so that everything can waste more space with giant text.

That's what the outer min() is for: it makes sure the font size caps out at 1.3em which usually translates to 16 x 1.3 = 20.8px, which is well within the recommended size range for prose anyway.

What that whole snippet does boils down to exactly what they said in the article:

> The main global stylesheet uses the browser default font size, smoothly scaled up to 130% on higher-resolution displays as the baseline for the body text of the whole document.

On a low-dpi screen, nothing changes. On a high-dpi one, if you haven't set your browser text size to something larger, this snippet saves you from tiny unreadable text. Also note that ctrl+ and ctrl- to zoom still work just fine. It's not as dramatic a change as the sibling comment said. You can try it out on their site to see for yourself.

You misread. They said the opposite:

> Websites in the, (late), 1990s were characterised by many things, but a typical list might include:

> - Serif fonts

I would only use this kind of thing on the root element, then size all other elements relative to the root element e.g. h1 { font-size: 1.5rem; }. It's more manageable that way IMHO.

Thanks for the tip on clamp() by the way, TIL.

I've always liked ExoticSilicon's design, but not until this post did I realize their smart bit of CSS for default font size:

  font-size: min(max(1em, 1.3vw), 1.3em);

Which explains why it looks just right on my high-DPI Chromebook even though I haven't configured a big enough default font size for the browser.

This is going to be the default font-size for all of my websites now (preceded by a fallback for maximum compatibility of course).