neighbour
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
For example, I work in Data & AI and we have:
- data engineer
- analytics engineer
- data scientist
- AI engineer
What I don't know is what's the alternative?
Data Engineers are basically software developers.
Analytics Engineers were Data Analysts or BI Analysts but the job has changed so much that neither of those titles fit.
My opinion is that basically everyone should just be a "Developer" or "Programmer" and then have the area suffixed:
- Data Engineer → Developer (Data Infrastructure)
- Analytics Engineer → Developer (Analytics)
etc.
I hope that changes though.
Switch 2 does not.
I'm mostly a PC gamer but let's be real here.
Speaking from experience, I've been thoroughly enjoying the Switch 2. Even if I knew about this information before I bought the console, it would not impact my purchase decision.
Sony does something similar I believe with their new Classics Catalogue as part of their most premium PS Plus tier.
>As a gamedev I have a different perspective: Sony and Nintendo would be fools to give up backwards compatibility just for savings on chips.
In your view, is this issue worse with modern consoles now that the Playstation (and possibly Nintendo) online store purchases persist across generations? Imagine a scenario where someone has a PS4 and PS5, they buy many games through the Playstation Store, then Sony selects a different chip supplier for the PS6. I'm guessing this would cause issues with games that were designed for the older consoles, breaking backwards compatibility.
I'd imagine that if the console manufacturers cared about backwards compatibility, which I think they do, the likelihood of them switching chip providers would decrease with each generation.
You say this but I've seen countless videos of Apple stores getting raided by thugs who steal all the devices. We all know those devices will shut down and be inoperable but they don't know and/or care.