ncantelmo
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
I believe the tech world has a huge problem on its hands here, and that problem doesn't get anywhere near the attention it deserves. Large swaths of the population are turning into zombies and tech is the facilitator. Try looking at the drivers turning through a busy intersection some time. It's obscene how many are staring down at their phones rather than at whatever might be in the road around the corner.
That said, I don't believe the problem is simply that certain products remind or encourage people to use them at times. Rather, it's that there is a class of truly addictive products that don't do much (if anything) to help people manage the resulting dependency. And that approach is celebrated far more than it's scrutinized.
Coincidentally, I wrote the following on Twitter yesterday:
"Any potentially addictive software/service should offer a way for users to lock themselves out of their own account for a predetermined set of hours." [0]
It was meant in my usual tongue-in-cheek style, but I do think that a solution for breaking tech product dependency is sorely needed and hope this discussion gains some steam.
A decade ago, I had a front-row seat for Yahoo! under the stewardship of CEOs brought in to run the business well. The focus was not on innovation, and the company continued to languish. Why? Because tech companies that don't innovate get their lunches eaten by the ones that do.
As for Buffett, I'm no expert on his portfolio, but I believe his track record was built on non-tech companies until very recently.
It's depressing how many companies blindly throw unencrypted credentials around like this.
I've been an OSS user and supporter for a long time. I don't think I'll be open sourcing the core system anytime soon, but I'm very likely to release any useful NLP or ML-related libraries that are created as part of this project. Not sure what those will be or when they'll be ready, but I do have a mind to give back to the OSS community.
I had, in the past, also been thinking a bit about how the system could work offline because it would avoid a lot of security issues for something like a medical office that wants to create content that's then copied into a medical records system.
My initial thought was to bundle a local copy of the server with pre-trained models, but that becomes problematic on mobile clients. I'm writing the server in Go, so if I go that route I'd probably need to reimplement parts of it in another language and avoid using any remote APIs.
So the answer is: very likely yes, but not initially. You've definitely moved the functionality up my planned features list.
My initial target is short-form content such as blog posts and essays. I'm going to wait to see how that goes to decide what to focus on next, but odds are that it'll be more structured content like academic papers or technical reports.
I'm definitely not ruling out an eventual focus on creative writing, but it'll take a bit for the system to get to that stage.
That said, I'm designing it with the ability to ingest annotated writing samples of any sort, so it's possible that a wider range of writing types will be supported sooner than expected.
Project: I'm building a conversational UI / bot (https://writing.ai) that helps people write faster. The basic idea is that it asks you a series of questions about a topic, asks follow-up questions for more detail as needed, and when it's done outputs a completed draft. You're still providing the content, but the system understands the structure of completed documents and knows what questions to ask to get the actual writing done more easily.
I just quit my job and started working on this full time last week, so no public version yet, but signups are very welcome.
https://about.me/ncantelmo