nate-gehringer
Joined 9 months ago
Joined 9 months ago
Prodding an LLM into solving a problem is just not the same thing. I understand that the results of prompting could be more exciting than programming to some, but the idea that manual coding is “over” feels dismissive of hobbyists at the very least. Perhaps the author is suggesting that manual programming in the industry is over, but I don’t buy that either. Thesis being, there will eventually be a cost to employing “experts” that lack understanding.
> If agents can handle the code, could we finally work directly with the logic, interfaces, and data models we want?
Aren’t high-level programming languages very refined encodings of “logic, interfaces, and data models?” Why would using natural language be more efficient at such things than special-purpose languages developed over decades?
In my opinion, the existing UI widget that solves this problem best is a plain old group of radio buttons (auto, light, dark). Two checkboxes that interact with each other and also a sometimes-hidden label is something new for users to learn and also more complex to implement and maintain.
Links to posts no longer contain URL fragments, but I kept the fragment-style links working with JavaScript.
I’m definitely planning on add a wider array of chords types now that the app is basically working. As far as the 7th inversions, I essentially “ignored” inversions by flattening the notes into a single octave … there may be an issue with this logic.
I came across <https://chord-display.rednet.io> myself yesterday and took a cursory look. Nice app. They use a library called `tonal` <https://github.com/tonaljs/tonal> for their music theory logic, which ought to be a good resource to validate against.