naniel
Joined 2 months ago
Joined 2 months ago
for those who need a primer on this: https://endash.us/toolkit/items/mini-shai-halud (yes an ai-assisted build obvi, but not just an ai blog)
"We (the researchers and the agents) did not see any of their work through any means until they released it publicly — in particular, no specific user data was accessed in order to solve this problem. While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models . However, our proofs differ significantly and even the precise results proved are different in the Euler case (forced vs unforced)." https://openai.com/index/navier-stokes-solution/
NOTE: there are a couple duped threads around this. i replied on a different one first before seeing this one
What's most striking to me, and what may or may not be true, is the "we cannot rule out" bit.
"We (the researchers and the agents) did not see any of their work through any means until they released it publicly — in particular, no specific user data was accessed in order to solve this problem. While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models . However, our proofs differ significantly and even the precise results proved are different in the Euler case (forced vs unforced)." https://openai.com/index/navier-stokes-solution/
Silly, stupid, whatever. But it's open-source and able to be cloned/forked to answer your "real" questions with ease.
Oh, and you can submit your own questions to be added to the list.
Built with assistance from n-dx
For those who aren't familiar with teamPCP's big attack recently, we made a Scroll to highlight how it was so effective: https://endash.us/toolkit/items/mini-shai-halud
Classic hindsight bias.. And it's funny that Sam is saying this.. just a few months ago i saw his interview where he claimed to be very good at seeing the future and predicting what will happen