mzl

Why? I'm not being glib here, but I don't see what it really changes fundamentally that makes it noteworthy except as a curiosity.

Such releases often show weaknesses if the intelligence index, because the models that are ranked jointly do not have the same percieved level of quality.

Skills for creating good and repeatable benchmarking scripts.

A knowledge base for my research area, with tools for paper ingestion and search.

An md file to html presentation tool, there are several but this one helps me.

A review tool that splits a PR or branch intelligently into modules, and does per module reviews and global reviews for different aspects, and then summarizing that into a report. Can be used with multiple different harnesses. Written as a Python project, but build-time assembled into a single-file Python script with uv run --script shbang line.

If you modify the work, that creates a derived work from whatever copyright the original works has, not a new work that is fully copyrightable.

As the article says in the Tl;DR at the top the code may be contaminated by open source licenses

> Agentic coding tools like Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex generate code that may be uncopyrightable, owned by your employer, or contaminated by open source licenses you cannot see

Kimi K2.5 and K2.6 are both >1T

It is tricky to build good infrastructure for prompt caching.

Which version of Kimi and served from where?

I've been prescribed slightly more than 5g per day (2 x 650mg tablets every 6 hours) for pain after an operation jointly with ibuprofen, which is scarily close to the limits.

I've heard people saying the study is bad, but whenever I've asked about why the answers have been pretty bad. Do you have a good source for why we should disregard it?