Recent submissions

Comment · 8 months ago
pretty sweet!
Comment · 8 months ago
Yes, fair point. I was trying to use the same comparison we are currently having between closed weights and open weights and their time gap. If there might be a similar time gap to what is possible with ordinary equipment.
Comment · 8 months ago
Maybe the industry adapts too and the future PC is AI-ready out-of-the-box. Because people demand that.
Comment · 8 months ago
I love the spec, but it is like 5x or 10x a Macbook Air I mean really ordinary, Personal Computer in broad sense - not dedicated LLM kit.
Comment · 8 months ago
Yes, a small open model that can run on today's hardware and that compared to a historic SOTA closed model with all in. What time difference do we think?
Comment · 8 months ago
Thanks, yes, I meant even ordinary retail PCs, not specialized GPUs. At some point in time in history, SOTA closed models were at a level that compares to todays open models that can run on ordinary hardware.
Comment · 8 months ago
Yes, I meant ordinary hardware which you find at home, like a current MacBook Air or equivalent Windows desktop. There must be a time frame when early SOTA LLMs were at a level that compares to open models that can run on ordinary hardware. But it's more like years rather than months. My rough guess would be 2-3 years. Which still would be amazing if we could get OPUS 4.5 quality within 2-3 years on an ordinary computer.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton