musgravepeter

Joined 13 years ago

Karma
866
Submissions
139
Member since
May 8
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 3 months ago
Perhaps start with https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21660

"It is certainly true that there are aspects of relativity that are counterintuitive, not only to retired engineers but also to many physicists."

Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
Both these books are on my book shelf and are very good. Bate et. al. especially since it is a Dover book and very affordable.

The book that is always on my DESK is "Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications" by Vallado. There is also a website with code from the book for Hohmann and Lambert transfers among other things. <self-promotion>This has been indispensable in creating my Unity Asset "Gravity Engine".</self-promotion>

Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
The article mentions "few known exact solutions". There are actually quite a number. Most are from after 1950.

Cambridge University Press has two good books: Exact Spacetimes in Einstein's General Relativity (Griffith & Podolsky) - good readable (if you speak GR) account of the more common solutions Exact Solutions of Einstein's Feild Equations (Stephani, Kramer, MacCallum, Hoenstelaers, Herlt) - encyclopedic, authoritative and mathematical. In my case an aspirational purchase

Comment · 4 years ago
L4 and L5 are stable when the smaller mass is less than about 0.0385 times the larger mass [1]. This means e.g. a typical binary star system would not have stable L4/L5 points. The reference [1] works through this in careful detail and is an excellent reference on this topic.

[1] Solar System Dynamics, Murray and Dermott, Cambridge University Press.

Comment · 4 years ago
+1 for Artin's Algebra. I think is very under appreciated.
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
There is Geometric Algebra for Physicists by Doran and Lasenby (2003). It recasts mechanics, E&M up to gauge theories and GR into geometric algebra. I stalled out at mechanics but I've now taken it off the Tsundoku pile and may give it another chance.
Comment · 5 years ago
I had a quick look and this seems like a solid, concise intro to GR.

The article https://people.carleton.edu/~nchriste/PTO000041.pdf gives an overview of the ways and books to learn GR. It does not cover some more recent intro books.

If you like "physics first" then I am a big fan of Hartle's book.

Comment · 5 years ago
Snap. I am also a physicist trying to learn math. In my case it's:

- Introduction to Analysis (Mattuck)

- Elementary Differential Geometry (Pressley)

both chosen because they have solutions in the book, which I find important for self-study.

Also just got (hot off the presses)

Visual Differential Geometry and Forms (Needham)

Looks fantastic!

Topology is next on the list...

Comment · 5 years ago
Steinhardt's book "The second kind of impossible" describes his involvement with quasi-crystals. It's very worthwhile.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton