mukmuk

As soon as I hit the “At [current company name], we...” part of a blog post, I sigh a bit.

“Pacing the frontier” sounds smarmy and weird, like the phrase was generated by Claude itself

This specific analysis seems to have some basic problems, but I think a lot of us sense a degree of coordination here culminating in Dario’s letter.

If you were to work backward from “we need to lower training costs so that we can go public and make trillions” then you might come up with a plan similar to what we have seen.

Updated. Had been trying not to make it overlong.

Specifically for tax evasion related to an addiction to playing poker with billionaires.

> “He is not wealthy enough to sustain the losses of the billionaires he has played against, and he is not good enough at poker to win at the rate of professionals,” they wrote.

Tobey Maguire was among the witnesses. He had hired Goldstein to help collect a $7.8 million poker debt from billionaire Andy Beal.

> “No,” someone who works with the prompts said when asked if they think ChatGPT users know that humans are reading their chats. “I don’t think they would imagine some contractor somewhere [...] is analyzing the conversations.”

> 404 Media asked OpenAI if it had explicitly told users that humans may review their prompts in order to improve ChatGPT’s responses, and if so, to point to where this disclosure is. OpenAI did not answer this question.

Why was this flagged?!

Can one of the undoubtedly many meta employees reading this comment section speculate on why this happened?

The attorneys who did this were Carmen Ortiz, Stephen P. Heymann, and Scott Garland. To their everlasting shame.