morph123

I guess. I assume the OpenAI vision, in the short term, is for there to be a beefy LLM on top that can call the correct sub LLMs that have more bespoke knowledge about random things, and sort of orchestrate an answer based on that.

Not sure why OpenAI feels the need to pay people for this though, I guess to incentivize use?

Still dont understand why anyone would "pay" for this. The default model will probably be better in pretty much all cases. I guess if someone randomly has some sort of esoteric knowledge? Seems very limited.

This «merge with the ai» thing never makes any sense. What possible improvement would a hunan provide a super intelligent AI in some merge operation?

Ideas are, will be, and always has been, worthless on their own.

These boys will not be your rank and file employees. They will operate exactly as they have done in OpenAI. Only difference will be that they no longer have this weird "non-profit, but actually some profit" thing going on.

These investors must be very dumb. Like pushing toothpaste back in the tube.

You think life was better before oil?

As smart as the people are at OpenAI they sure do some incredibly stupid things.

I guess it proves that this "company" is ran by scientists and not business people, which I guess is reassuring?

Haha yeah they are kicking out the CEO of their most profitable venture because he uses a mac.

It is a shame. Altman always seemed like his heart was in the right place with this stuff.

Much prefer him to the deepmind people who seem almost psychopathic by comparison.

This is the craziest thing I have ever seen.

I wonder how far away we are from "make a movie from a sentence".

2030?

Also why do these AI people always end with "this does not replace anyone". Surely they do not believe this?

Value is a human concept.

What things are «designed for» and what they end up being are often not 1 to 1.