monkeydust

No, a very large software company. Have a team structure so not dealing with day to day but ultimately responsible. Have spent last year blending the team with engineers who have been interested in getting into product. Ultimately see that will be direction of travel across the industry.

PMs ultimately take bets. Some to many will fail and if they are great a few will pay off in an excessive way. I have yet to see anything in the AI field that make better bets than my best PMs (I manage 50 of them) but as soon as I do the whole calculus changes. I joke with them about it. They also joke back it could happen to me (which it absolutely could). We live in interesting times.

If they are not already there!

Largely speaking eating is an activity that only involves yourself. Whereas, writing and thinking are largely activities to communicate ideas between yourself and others. Basically it matters more how this is done.

So lets extrapolate to the very near future.

Getting work done will require combination of biological and silicon agents working together.

Will our silicon counterparts also want as many meetings as biological equivalent to get the same work done?

Ditto. Android user as well.

Feel I need to play around with these new breed of classifiers so came up with this personal use case yesterday whilst at gym:

"If update from select group of individuals on WhatsApp is classified as urgent then interrupt my music."

Doable?

Right. There's plenty of software simulators in racing so was surprised their testing harness doesn't use one.

And also Google is public listed company and the other two (for now) are private. I think that fact does have a strong bearing on how they operate.