mollmerx
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
Note that he does not say that he was unable to answer the question. That is a conclusion you jumped to.
A good airport for transiting into Europe, and in my view usually more pleasant than London, Frankfurt or Paris, is Amsterdam Schiphol.
It seems unlikely to me that any language could become mainstream without being open source. The expectation that a compiler or interpreter should have its source available is only growing.
At the same time, kx's kdb+ is an example of a product that sits in a niche and has generated significant revenue despite being closed source. kdb+ has achieved this by primarily targeting financial services, which is a sector that's less sensitive to closed source than most, and is able to spend money on whichever product solves their problem.
If kerf manages to gain an edge over its competitors for a particular set of problems then sure, it can thrive in the long run the way kdb+ has.
Also, the inclusion of non-ASCII operators harkens back to APL. Mind mind isn't yet made up on whether I like this. I anticipate code being easier to read and harder to type. Given perl5's reputation in this regard, I'm optimistic I'll find it to be an improvement.