mhmmmmmm

I don't think thats necessarily true, they aren't really capacity constrained in practice (they might be behind the scenes and adjust training on the fly, but thats speculation), so wasting tokens effectively helps utilize their (potentially idle) inference GPU's

Removing the "Market expert" which uses OHLCV (Open, High, Low, Close, Volume) also drops the sharpee from 5.01 to 1.88 while also increasing the max draw down to 13.29% (v.s. 9.70% for the index). I'd be very surprised if the pre training of the base model was the only source of leakage...

Bybit was quite literally using Gnosis Safe for the compromised wallet.

> This is not something you can just log in on Binance and buy with cash in a single click.

You would've definitely been able to buy it with cash and a few clicks, for example using moonshot. (And I'm sure a couple other / similar platforms)

Is reliably detecting if code has any infinite loops feasible? Sounds like the halting problem.

So now I probabilistically spam a ton of different orders to on average get my desired fill... This just turns it into a "whoever is best at DoS'ing the exchange" game. As the orderbook fills with competitor orders it makes sense for yourself to also spam orders so each of your orders maintains the same probability of being filled