Recent submissions

Comment · 12 hours ago
Fine. So your pet peeve is waste and you'd reframe it as "If we can waste so much money, why can't we do X?".
Comment · 21 hours ago
This is just a longer version of "If we can spend so much on defense, why can't we do X?". The OP is compelling enough in understanding the tradeoffs of medical prevention vs. treatment. No need to rope in your pet peeve du jour.
Comment · 2 days ago
Generally an ad represents a product in its most flattering light rather than an even-handed evaluation of its features pro and con. That's why.
Comment · 2 days ago
The implication of your comment is that the description/review/opinions expressed by Ben in that video were inaccurate due to having received the printer for free. Is that what you're suggesting?
Comment · 2 days ago
Comment · 2 days ago
For another $250, you can get another box that washes and cures.
Comment · 2 days ago
> "true" SLA

What is that? Why is it better?

Comment · 2 days ago
It says it includes "Open Material Mode" which let's you "...print with any 405 nm photopolymer resin or 1064 nm powder on Formlabs 3D printers..."
Comment · 5 days ago
> Except if you are hitting 100% utilization at any point, there isn't really any slack.

Yes, that's why the phrase "when the need lessens" is important.

Besides that, it may be a reasonable decision that 95% utilization is acceptable in order to spend the additional money on something that provides more benefit.

Comment · 9 days ago
You must be enthusiastic about people using ERs when they have strep throat, right?

Let me think for a few seconds about ideas. Fitter EMTs who can assist people in more demanding physical situations. A subset of firefighters who can provide medical assistance but don't need the complete fire training curriculum and so can be paid less. Maintaining the ratio of firefighters and stations which was previously found satisfactory but adjusting it for requiring fewer of them since we have fewer fires.

Your turn.

Comment · 9 days ago
> Ahh yes, the old "why do we have all these inefficient empty hospital beds???" problem.

Yeah. That makes sense a lot of the time. It also makes sense to reduce capacity when the need lessens while still maintaining adequate slack.

Comment · 9 days ago
Sure. And that's carrying someone out of a burning building. Most of the time the building you're getting someone out of isn't burning and you don't need someone trained to fight fires to do that and that person will cost less to employ.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton