mfontani
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
That seems risky.
Much water has passed under bridges, yet there are dozens of us even creating new ones and doing all sorts of weird things with this great hobby.
The Multi User Dungeon discord is nowadays the place to meet like-minded people who like, or code, or balance, or design, or write or use clients for, MUDs. Join us at https://discord.gg/multi-user-dungeon-279748146316312576
IAC WILL MUD
> 6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor > The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.
So if you wish to restrict the use of the Software "in a business" (or in other endeavours), it won't be considered "open source".
The CC licenses aren't great for software, either, IMO. They're great for things like assets, basically... and that's about it.
That said, there's plenty "code available" licenses you may use. You just can't then call them "open source" since they're not.
Another way to put it: say I provide a patch to that software for you. I release it under the same terms as you provided. If you use it, well... you can't use it in your commercial product... as the license forbids it? ;-)
Because running those tests in your environment ensures that... that module can run in your environment.
By way of example, if a module requires a specific library installed to actually run, running its tests will ensure you catch the problem, and install it, so it can then actually run. Else you'd only find out at runtime that something's missing.
Note also that not all tests are the same, and (unfortunately!) not all modules' tests are the same, either: there's tests that ensure the module works "generally", and there's some author/development tests that on a _properly written_ module are only ran by the author/developer, and skip running when the modules are instead installed by mere users, for whom instead the "standard" "will this module work in this environment?" tests are the only one that get ran.
> I have horrible memories of the DBD::MySQL package failing to install because it ran tests that assumed localhost was running a MySQL server
I believe that got fixed, IIRC, as I've had no trouble installing that module (and running its tests at install time, natch). I said "fixed" as that seems like the sort of test that makes sense for the module's authors/developers to run, and not mere users of it.
I'm personally of the idea that enough backwards compatibility _should_ be preserved, but not _so_ much as to inhibit new/better syntax constructs and the like.
But honestly it's the sort of thing that is more like "I'll know it when I see it" more than anything.
Re "long term maintenance mode", there's the not so small matter of how many people can, in fact, actually develop perl. The codebase is large and full of many traps. It's a difficult, but not impossible, codebase to contribute to.
My sincere hope is that enough things will get out of "experimental", including quite a bit more of the "class" feature, for the end result to be enough to be called "7" and we'll go from there.
Basically... mostly a marketing thing, as today's 5.40 is way, way different (and better in so many respects) than 5.8 or 5.20 or even 5.32... but the (minor) version number doesn't show that.
A "perl 7" would.
There's https://metacpan.org/dist/perl/view/pod/perlclass.pod, which (granted) is experimental, but it's actively being worked on.
> Still no working exception handling!
There's https://metacpan.org/dist/perl/view/pod/perlsyn.pod#Try-Catc... which is now (5.40) no longer an experiment, _aside from_ the use of `finally`, which warns.
> trying to guarantee backwards compat for all the legacy code
Not "all", as there are indeed deprecations added over time, but _most_. I really, really like that I can, more often than not, take a program I wrote decades ago and it will still run properly.
You likely need all of them ;-)
IIRC it "fixes" terminfo stuff "within tmux" for kitty regardless of what $TERM is set. Mind you, I was using the latest tmux at that time. tmux 3.2?
Here's the issue I had: https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/issues/3018
Looks like it should be fixed on a very recent tmux; otherwise this MIGHT help:
set-option -as terminal-features ',xterm-kitty:RGB'
... or not.My reason to no longer using kitty is simple: I don't like having to copy kitty's terminfo data to every single system I connect to in order to have my terminal work.
It's fine for those few systems I very often connect to, of course.
But I also connect to ephemeral systems, sometimes for a short session, and the toil and friction inherent in having to do that just isn't worth it.
Sure, "kitty +kitten ssh ..." can work in most people's scenarios. Didn't quite work in mine, due to various intricacies about my ssh setup - multiple ssh keys, handled mostly by ssh-ident.
wezterm Just Worked for me. As I got "back" to also using other systems like Windows and MacOS, it Just Worked there, too. No fiddling with terminfo, no fiddling with $TERM, either.
Happy days.
set -g default-terminal xterm-256color
set-option -sa terminal-overrides ',xterm-kitty:RGB'
set-option -ga terminal-overrides ",xterm*:Tc:smcup@:rmcup@"
set-option -ga terminal-overrides ",screen*:Tc:smcup@:rmcup@"
set-option -ga terminal-overrides ",tmux*:Tc:smcup@:rmcup@"
I honestly don't know whether all are needed, or only some. But with these, it worked well for me.
You can contact me at [email protected]
old gpg key revocation: https://darkpan.com/mfontani-changing-keys-20151210.txt
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mfontani; my proof: https://keybase.io/mfontani/sigs/S_IUeD_qpq4JRMtNG4BiCj97N8LbcQClGT_niI_a9ms ]
meet.hn/city/45.41807,9.27165/San-Donato-Milanese
Socials: - github.com/mfontani - linkedin.com/in/marcofontani - reddit.com/user/mfontani
Interests: Cybersecurity, DevOps, Gaming, Hacking, Open Source, Programming, Remote Work, Technology, Web Development
---