melodyogonna

I never understand why people say things like this. It is not uncommon for languages to have multiple implementations, everything must not be abandoned for Rust man.

Good. I too I'm not a fan of MCPs, but these days I do find them useful. In Claude Code I connected to my company's MCP which made Claude Code infinitely more useful for everyday work stuff

The pace the American government is willing to adopt new technology is underrated. Americans are very nimble

Yup. Go maturity is realising how little you need to use channels and Goroutines. You probably just need a setup in one place, like in front of incoming requests ... which using net/http already does for you.

Spamming them all over the place is a red flag imo

Very neat, and comes pretty close to how Mojo handles portable SIMD.

It's great to see two of my favorite languages finally making SIMD easy to use. It's such low-hanging fruit for performance, yet somehow languages have ignored it for years. Portable SIMD, even with some performance penalty, still beats scalar computation whenever vector operations are needed. Yet language implementations always seemed to assume that hardware-specific SIMD APIs were the only way to go. That did nothing but make SIMD unusable excepting special cases where performance is absolutely critical, rather than just something anyone can use in day to day programming.

Comes to Rails conference. Gives a keynote with nothing about Rails. Leaves.

I have an application usecase where this will be very helpful indeed.

Did you finish the video? It has CI, but I don't know if they implemented merge gating. Though I suppose that could be part of the land skill

What do you mean?

You could also use Mojo, one language for all targets.