mbca
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
There may be other cases where one gets something entirely different than the __NSDictionaryI class, depending on how the dictionary was created or how much / what kind of data it contains. There is some evidence[1] that Apple switches implementations of its collection classes based on various conditions, even something very simple, such as when an array contains more than X elements (where "X" is some threshold where the optimization characteristics change). Being able to dynamically change implementations is the main benefit of class clusters after all.
If I'm in downtown or SOMA, I will use a taxi (either hailing or using Flywheel). It's usually a huge time saver (and there's no "surge" pricing either).
[1] https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/websearch/IFl...
A precursor to AirBnB!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tyranny_of_Structurelessnes...
http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
It should be required reading for anyone pushing the "we don't need managers" line.
Not going to happen. Those "regulators" they decry so loudly? I'm sure they have plans to buy a few once they get big enough and use them to put barriers in place to put a stop to any competitors. Combine that with their size (and thus their ability to undercut any new competition), and I don't see anything but an Uber monopoly on the way.
Android has already gotten miles better in the year since Rubin is no longer involved, seeing long-needed improvements such as Chrome for the browser and WebViews, radically better runtime, more unified UI design, etc. Overall, Android is much better off without him and I look forward to whatever comes next (for Android, not Rubin).
(I did look at the abstract of the actual paper, but it doesn't seem to specify. The full paper might say, but it's paywalled.)