Recent submissions

Comment · 6 years ago
But doing this will give you a static IP which will make you even less anonymous.
Comment · 6 years ago
Is Mullvad the only provider you are using with WireGuard?
Comment · 6 years ago
Sharing an IP address with a load of other people makes one more anonymous. I know there are lots of different ways of identifying someone online but it is a start. My ISP is also behind a CGNAT so I am also sharing that IP with loads of other people and also most ISPs don’t provide static IP addresses so you can’t rely on an that either but I guess I also trust my VPN provider to handle identifying data more than my ISP as I haven’t even given them my name (Mullvad)
Comment · 6 years ago
Sorry to go on a tangent (I believe it is word of mouth and actions of the company like you say):

What is the deal with Mullvad and Firefox? Are they completely using your services but with their name on it? Would you rather a client directly or through Firefox (bit cheaper now in $ )?

Comment · 9 years ago
Reading this from my phone looked like you meant there was a web scraping tool actually called “this[0]” which would be a cracking name.
Comment · 9 years ago
“Process payments with facial recognition” ??

Can anyone tell me more about that?

Comment · 9 years ago
Sorry I have only just seen this. What a fantastic answer, thank you so much I completely get it now.
Comment · 9 years ago
Does anyone know what are the pros and cons between this and “online learning” ?

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton