maxignol

To truly live as a couple, not as two individuals together I'd say then ?

Currently, only claude code and codex in cli, soon Claude Desktop as well.

> And one of the hardest optimization problems of being human is deciding who to love.

I truly agree. But then what do you look for in a relationship ? Cause to any optimization problems there are constraints and an objective function to push the metaphor ?

Well, the software for now is designed for trusted groups of users, so appart from making sure users can't access sessions of others in the same pool, there's not much.

For context, it's sent in every request of claude code and codex (only in http, not websocket) so we don't have to handle anything, the server just rewrites the auth headers of the request, keeping it intact out of that.

We've not found a way to make it completely legal yet but working on it lol

Hope you'll find someone with whom this will be different

Thank you for the reply

Hi ! It's been a few months since with my best friend (and cofounder) we were really getting sick of one rate limiting while the other had plenty of "tokens" left on his Claude subscription. So we made this. And we find it cool so we share it to you.

Please give us feedback, that'd be really appreciated, negative or positive ;)

Author here. Two things that are worth repeating up front: corpus A is 84% of the pooled bill, so the pooled −0.01% is pretty much "corpus A plus noise" so read it per-rows instead. And p_fire is a lower bound because of the detector's sensitivity taken as 1 (which it obviously isn't). Caveman's real fire rate is somewhat higher than 50.6%. Code and commands: github.com/jaynapp/jayn-caveman

> I don't know if engaging with that button means I'm less likely to be served such content, or whether it's cleaning up everyone's feeds.

I would guess it's both cause I've been having less AI slop on LinkedIn for the past few weeks (yet not none).